Top Frameworks to Pair with Headless CMS for Fast Web Development

Pairing a headless CMS with the right frameworks can make a significant difference when considering the best ways to speed up web development. Modern development teams face increasing pressure to deliver content across multiple platforms while maintaining flexibility and performance.

Headless CMS frameworks offer the flexibility and efficiency developers need, allowing you to manage content and deliver it across web, mobile, IoT devices, and emerging platforms. Whether you're building progressive web applications, managing complex content APIs, or implementing omnichannel content strategies, these frameworks provide the architectural foundation for scalable digital experiences.

This comprehensive guide covers everything you need to know about headless CMS frameworks for fast, flexible web development in today's multi-channel landscape.

In brief:

• Headless CMS frameworks deliver 30-50% page load improvements and 40-60% latency reductions through decoupled architecture, though success requires proper API design, multi-layer caching strategies, and frontend framework expertise.
• Development costs typically exceed platform licensing by substantial margins ($5,000-$50,000+ for custom integrations), requiring careful assessment of team capabilities in modern frontend frameworks, API patterns, and infrastructure management.
• Multi-channel content delivery requirements justify headless architecture complexity; single-channel websites with limited technical resources are better served by traditional CMS platforms.
• AI integration and composable architecture are transitioning from optional features to foundational requirements across enterprise implementations.

What are Some Typical Use Cases of Headless CMS Frameworks?

Choosing the right architecture can be overwhelming, especially when delivering high-quality web applications that need to scale across multiple channels and touchpoints.

Building Progressive Web Applications and Multi-Channel Experiences

Headless CMS frameworks excel at powering progressive web applications (PWAs) and complex multi-channel digital experiences. The decoupled architecture enables application shell patterns where base UI components load instantly from browser cache while dynamic content fetches asynchronously from CMS APIs.

This technical pattern delivers offline-first experiences without complex native app development. This architecture separates content management from presentation layers, allowing content updates via API without app store resubmissions and enabling service workers to manage offline capabilities and background content updates.

This separation allows you to implement sophisticated caching strategies across multiple layers. Service workers can intercept content requests, returning cached content for offline experiences while fetching fresh data when connectivity returns. Combined with multi-layer caching at CDN and application levels, the result is sub-second page loads and resilient user experiences regardless of network conditions.

Modern implementations achieve measurable performance gains: peer-reviewed research shows 30-50% page load improvements compared to traditional CMS platforms, with real-world implementations like Android Authority achieving 30% page load improvements and 6x Lighthouse score increases.

Managing Content APIs and Microservices Integration

One of the strongest advantages of using a headless CMS is its role as a content microservice within larger application architectures. You can build configurable content APIs with built-in features like authentication, caching, and webhooks that integrate with existing microservices ecosystems.

This approach enables sophisticated microservices composition patterns where frontend applications communicate through an API gateway that orchestrates calls to specialized services: the headless CMS content APIs, authentication services, search systems, and personalization engines.

This architecture provides independent horizontal scaling for each service component, creating resilient systems where individual service disruptions remain isolated.

Here's how you can configure a webhook to trigger rebuilds when content updates:

1// config/webhooks.js
2module.exports = {
3  settings: {
4    webhooks: {
5      'content-updated': {
6        enabled: true,
7        url: process.env.BUILD_WEBHOOK_URL,
8        headers: {
9          'Authorization': `Bearer ${process.env.WEBHOOK_TOKEN}`
10        },
11        events: ['entry.create', 'entry.update', 'entry.delete']
12      }
13    }
14  }
15};

API composition at the gateway layer enables best-of-breed component selection while managing integration complexity through centralized routing, authentication enforcement, and rate limiting controls. Each service maintains its own scaling characteristics and deployment lifecycle, allowing content infrastructure to scale independently from application logic and supporting services.

The API-first design supports both REST and GraphQL patterns, allowing you to optimize data fetching for specific frontend requirements. GraphQL implementations particularly shine for content-heavy applications, reducing API round trips by fetching related content in single queries.

Implementing Static Site Generation with Dynamic Content

Modern static site generators paired with headless CMS create powerful hybrid architectures that combine the performance benefits of pre-rendered HTML with the flexibility of dynamic content management. Build-time content fetching pulls data from CMS APIs during site generation, while webhook-triggered rebuilds automatically regenerate sites when content updates.

Next.js, Gatsby, and Nuxt.js integrations enable Incremental Static Regeneration (ISR), updating individual pages without full site rebuilds. Performance benchmarks show Next.js builds 10,001 posts in approximately 4 minutes 37 seconds, while Nuxt.js requires approximately 4 minutes 59 seconds, providing concrete expectations for CI/CD pipeline planning.

This architecture pattern delivers significant advantages: pre-rendered static HTML eliminates server-side processing overhead, reduces attack surface area, and handles traffic spikes gracefully without requiring infrastructure scaling.

Scaling International and Multi-Regional Content

Headless CMS frameworks provide sophisticated internationalization capabilities that go beyond simple content translation. You can implement locale-specific URL structures, content fallback strategies, and region-aware content delivery through API-driven architectures.

Technical implementation involves designing modular content types with locale fields, implementing translation workflows, and configuring CDN edge locations for optimal geographic content delivery. The headless approach enables different frontend frameworks for different regions while maintaining centralized content management.

Advanced implementations support complex scenarios like region-specific product catalogs, localized pricing structures, and compliance with regional data residency requirements, all managed through unified content APIs.

Separating Frontend Innovation from Backend Stability

The architectural separation between frontend presentation and backend content management creates significant advantages for development velocity and system reliability. Frontend teams can work independently with modern frameworks and libraries while backend systems focus on content delivery, security, and integration patterns.

This decoupling enables you to update frontend technologies without affecting content management workflows. Content creators continue working with familiar interfaces while developers experiment with new frameworks, implement performance optimizations, or migrate to different hosting solutions.

The pattern particularly benefits organizations with distinct frontend and backend expertise, allowing teams to optimize their specific domains without cross-functional bottlenecks.

What are the Top 10 Open Source JavaScript Headless CMS Frameworks?

With so many options out there, finding a headless CMS that aligns with your needs is essential. But which one should you choose? Let's explore some of the best open-source JavaScript headless CMS frameworks in 2025.

Strapi

Strapi stands out for its flexibility and ease of use. It offers a robust content types builder, allowing you to create custom content structures tailored to your needs. With its API-first approach, you can integrate content seamlessly across various platforms. The media library and granular access controls enhance content management, making it a favorite among developers.

Ghost

Ghost is a powerful headless CMS designed primarily for bloggers and content creators. It provides a minimalist interface that focuses on writing and publishing content. Ghost supports dynamic routing and custom themes, making it easy to create a unique user experience. Its built-in SEO features and fast performance are additional perks.

Directus

Directus transforms SQL databases into a headless CMS, providing a user-friendly interface for managing content. It supports both REST and GraphQL APIs, enabling flexible content delivery. Directus excels in handling complex data structures and offers extensive customization options, making it suitable for various applications.

Decap CMS

Decap CMS, formerly known as Netlify CMS, is a Git-based headless CMS that integrates seamlessly with static site generators like Gatsby and Hugo. It offers a simple, intuitive interface for content editors and supports custom widgets and extensions. Decap CMS is ideal for static websites and provides a smooth content management experience.

Payload CMS

Payload CMS is a modern headless CMS built with TypeScript and Node.js. It offers a flexible schema builder, powerful access control, and real-time collaboration features. Payload CMS supports both REST and GraphQL APIs, making it easy to integrate with various front-end frameworks. Its focus on developer experience and customization sets it apart.

Tina CMS

Tina CMS is an open-source headless CMS designed for React-based applications. It provides inline editing capabilities, allowing you to edit content directly on the page. Tina CMS supports custom plugins and extensions, making it highly customizable. Its real-time collaboration features and seamless integration with Git make it a popular choice for developers.

KeystoneJS

KeystoneJS is a headless CMS and application framework built with Node.js. It offers a powerful schema builder, dynamic content types, and customizable access control. KeystoneJS supports both REST and GraphQL APIs, providing flexible content delivery options. Its modular architecture and extensive plugin ecosystem make it suitable for complex applications.

Webiny

Webiny is a serverless headless CMS built on top of AWS Lambda. It offers a robust content management interface, dynamic content types, and powerful access control. Webiny supports both REST and GraphQL APIs, enabling seamless content integration. Its serverless architecture ensures scalability and cost-efficiency, making it ideal for large-scale applications.

Sanity

Sanity is a real-time headless CMS that offers a flexible content model and powerful collaboration features. It supports both REST and GraphQL APIs, providing versatile content delivery options. Sanity's real-time collaboration and version control features make it easy to manage content across teams. Its customizable interface and extensive plugin ecosystem enhance the development experience.

SonicJS

SonicJS is a lightweight, headless CMS built with Node.js. It offers a simple, intuitive interface for managing content and supports both REST and GraphQL APIs. SonicJS is designed for developers who need a straightforward, easy-to-use CMS with minimal setup. Its focus on simplicity and performance makes it suitable for small to medium-sized projects.

What are the Key Benefits of Using a Headless CMS Framework?

While headless CMS frameworks offer compelling architectural advantages, you might wonder whether they provide measurable benefits that justify the implementation complexity compared to traditional platforms.

Developer-Friendly Tools to Build, Manage, and Distribute Content

Headless CMS frameworks provide comprehensive toolsets designed specifically for modern development workflows. These platforms include intuitive content type builders, API explorers, and integrated development environments that streamline content modeling and API development.

The developer experience centers on familiar programming languages and modern development practices. Real-time collaboration features enable multiple team members to work on content structures simultaneously, while version control integration supports Git-based workflows for content schema management.

Advanced platforms provide CLI tools for automation, comprehensive SDKs for popular frameworks, and detailed API documentation with interactive examples. This tooling ecosystem reduces the learning curve and accelerates development cycles significantly.

Measurable Performance and Scalability Improvements

Academic research validates significant performance advantages: a peer-reviewed study of 34 CMS platforms demonstrates headless systems outperform traditional CMS across all critical metrics, including response time, error rate, throughput, and resource utilization.

Real-world implementations show consistent results. Organizations report 30-50% page load improvements and 40-60% latency reductions through aggressive CDN edge caching. Mobile optimization benefits are particularly pronounced, with page weight reductions of 60-70% using modern image formats and optimized content delivery.

The architecture enables horizontal scaling where you can add instances based on actual traffic demands rather than over-provisioning single servers. Multi-layer caching at edge, CDN, and application levels provides 10-100x traffic capacity without performance degradation through proper configuration and infrastructure optimization.

Extensible Architectures to Customize Experiences

One of the most significant advantages is architectural flexibility that extends beyond core CMS functionality. The plugin ecosystem and modular design enable you to customize content management workflows, integrate third-party services, and implement business-specific logic without vendor constraints.

This extensibility means you can evolve the system as requirements change. Whether integrating authentication providers, implementing custom content workflows, or adding specialized field types, the architecture accommodates growth without requiring platform migration.

The open, API-first design supports integration with existing technology stacks, allowing you to leverage current investments while modernizing content management capabilities incrementally.

Avoiding Vendor Lock-In with Open Architectures

Headless CMS frameworks help you avoid vendor lock-in through open, standards-based approaches to content management. Unlike traditional platforms that tie you to specific technologies and hosting environments, headless architectures allow complete flexibility in hosting, frontend frameworks, and integration choices.

You can deploy on any cloud provider, use preferred programming languages, and integrate with any third-party services required for your specific use cases. This freedom ensures you're not dependent on single-vendor ecosystems, providing flexibility to adapt technologies as business requirements evolve.

The API-first approach means your content remains accessible through standard REST and GraphQL interfaces, enabling easy migration between platforms if business needs change. Data portability features ensure content investments remain protected regardless of future technology decisions.

Robust Platform Ecosystem for Diverse Requirements

Modern headless CMS frameworks support extensive deployment scenarios and use cases. Whether building corporate websites, e-commerce platforms, mobile applications, or IoT content delivery systems, the platform ecosystem provides specialized tools and integrations for each scenario.

Frontend framework support spans React, Vue, Angular, and emerging technologies, ensuring compatibility with current and future development choices. Powerful APIs enable content delivery across different channels and devices.

This versatility makes headless CMS frameworks suitable for organizations of all sizes, from startup projects requiring rapid development to enterprise implementations demanding sophisticated compliance and security features.

What are Some Potential Drawbacks of Headless CMS Frameworks?

Headless CMS frameworks provide significant advantages, but they also introduce challenges that require careful consideration and planning to address successfully.

Technical Complexity and Expertise Requirements

Implementing headless CMS frameworks demands substantially more technical expertise than traditional platforms. Success requires deep proficiency across several critical dimensions:

• Modern frontend frameworks like React, Vue, Angular, or Svelte
• Comprehensive understanding of API integration patterns (REST and GraphQL implementations)
• Authentication mechanisms, rate limiting, and state management
• Content modeling practices that bridge technical and content strategy disciplines
• Infrastructure management including CI/CD pipelines and caching strategies
• Edge deployment configurations

The architectural complexity extends beyond individual technologies to system design. You need expertise in microservices patterns, caching strategies, CI/CD pipeline configuration, and distributed system debugging.

Teams often underestimate the learning curve required to manage these interconnected components effectively. Content teams must also adapt from WYSIWYG editing workflows to structured content management paradigms, requiring content strategy collaboration, training, and often fundamental changes to content creation processes.

Higher Development and Integration Costs

While platform licensing costs are often reasonable, development and integration expenses typically exceed platform fees by substantial margins. Developer rates range from $50-$150+ per hour depending on expertise and location, with custom integrations costing $5,000-$50,000+ depending on complexity.

Frontend development represents the dominant cost category in headless CMS implementations, typically exceeding platform licensing expenses substantially. Unlike traditional CMS platforms with ready-made themes and templates, headless implementations require custom frontend development. However, this burden is partially mitigated by framework-specific SDKs, starter templates, and boilerplate projects available from the developer community.

Ongoing maintenance costs are frequently underestimated but represent lifetime operational expenses that typically exceed platform licensing by substantial margins.

Managing API integrations, security updates, performance monitoring, and troubleshooting across distributed systems requires continuous technical investment that should be factored into total cost of ownership calculations rather than focusing solely on platform licensing fees.

Integration and Orchestration Challenges

Managing APIs across multiple systems creates substantial coordination complexity. E-commerce platforms, analytics systems, CRMs, marketing automation tools, and legacy systems must all integrate through API layers. Poor integration planning creates data silos, inconsistent user experiences, and rapid technical debt accumulation.

Organizations often discover that frontend implementations can rank poorly in search results due to missing technical SEO optimizations that were handled automatically in traditional CMS platforms.

The distributed architecture also complicates troubleshooting and monitoring. Issues may span multiple systems and require coordinated debugging across frontend applications, API gateways, content management systems, and third-party integrations.

Missing Out-of-the-Box Features

Traditional CMS platforms provide extensive libraries of themes, plugins, and ready-made functionality that accelerate development. Headless frameworks require significant custom development work for initial implementation and for features that would be available immediately in monolithic systems.

Content preview capabilities, workflow management tools, and editorial interfaces often require custom development because headless CMS platforms typically lack these as built-in features. While this provides ultimate flexibility for developers, it represents significant development time for functionality that many teams expect as standard features in traditional CMS platforms.

Security, backup, monitoring, and compliance features may also require custom implementation or third-party service integration, adding to both development time and ongoing operational complexity.

How do I Choose the Right Headless CMS Framework for my Project?

Finding a framework that aligns with your specific technical requirements and organizational constraints requires systematic evaluation of architectural trade-offs and honest assessment of team capabilities.

Evaluate Specific Project Requirements and Constraints

Start by defining your content architecture needs and multi-channel requirements. Assess content type complexity, ranging from simple blog posts to complex product catalogs with intricate relationships and custom fields. Consider content volume projections, workflow requirements, and approval processes that must be supported.

Channel delivery requirements drive many architectural decisions. If content must reach web applications, mobile apps, IoT devices, voice assistants, or emerging platforms, headless architecture provides significant advantages. Single-channel implementations rarely justify the additional complexity.

Integration landscape analysis is critical. Document existing systems requiring API integration:

• CRM platforms
• E-commerce engines
• Analytics tools
• Authentication systems
• Marketing automation platforms

Poor integration planning creates data silos, inconsistent user experiences, and rapid technical debt accumulation. Each integration represents both an ongoing maintenance burden and a potential failure point that compounds across multiple systems, requiring careful planning around API orchestration, data consistency management, and coordinated vendor support.

Assess Team Capabilities and Learning Requirements

Evaluate your team's required technical expertise across several dimensions:

• Modern frontend frameworks (React, Vue, Angular, or Svelte)
• API integration patterns (REST/GraphQL implementation, authentication mechanisms)
• Content modeling for structured data
• Infrastructure management (CI/CD pipelines, caching strategies, edge deployment)

Assess your team's realistic capacity for long-term maintenance burden, as development and integration costs typically exceed platform licensing by substantial margins. Content authoring teams must transition from WYSIWYG editors to structured content management approaches, a fundamental shift requiring training and new workflows.

Be honest about whether your frontend and backend teams can coordinate across decoupled systems and whether your organization can sustain the operational complexity of managing APIs, caching layers, and distributed services.

Maintenance capacity planning is essential and often underestimated in headless CMS implementations. Each microservice, API integration, and custom development creates significant ongoing support requirements:

• Distributed system troubleshooting across multiple components
• Security updates across API endpoints
• Multi-layer caching strategies at the CDN, API, and application levels
• Build times of 4-6 minutes in CI/CD pipelines for content-heavy sites with 10,000+ pages
• Managing concurrent API requests and preventing excessive or inefficient API calls
• Edge computing complexity

Success requires frontend framework expertise, DevOps automation capabilities, and strategic infrastructure configuration. Architectural advantages provide potential for optimization, not guaranteed performance without proper implementation.

Analyze Security and Compliance Requirements

Security assessment must address the distributed nature of headless architectures. API endpoints exposed across multiple frontend applications increase potential attack surface area. Implement OWASP API Security recommendations, focusing particularly on Broken Object Level Authorization and Broken Authentication vulnerabilities.

Compliance requirements vary significantly by industry. Healthcare applications must address HIPAA requirements, financial services need PCI-DSS compliance, and global applications require GDPR data protection measures. Each compliance framework impacts architecture decisions and implementation approaches.

Role-based access control (RBAC) becomes more complex in distributed systems and requires rigorous implementation following security frameworks from OWASP and NIST:

• Granular permissions management enforcing the principle of least privilege
• Robust API authentication patterns using OAuth 2.0 and JWT tokens
• Comprehensive audit trail requirements documenting all content access and modifications
• API endpoint protection mechanisms including rate limiting and request validation
• Multi-factor authentication (MFA) for administrative access
• Proper data protection through encryption at rest and in transit

Plan for Scalability and Performance Requirements

Content delivery performance expectations should be quantified early in the planning process. Modern headless implementations achieve 30-50% page load improvements and 40-60% latency reductions, but these benefits require proper architecture and configuration.

Build time planning is crucial for content-heavy sites. Comprehensive testing of modern frameworks shows concrete build time measurements for sites with 10,000+ pages: Next.js requires 4 minutes 37 seconds, Nuxt.js takes 4 minutes 59 seconds, and Astro takes 5 minutes 42 seconds. Plan for 4-6 minute build times when designing CI/CD pipelines and content publishing workflows.

Caching strategy design spans multiple layers:

• CDN edge caching
• API response caching
• Client-side caching through service workers

Each layer requires configuration and invalidation strategies that align with content update patterns.

Evaluate Community Ecosystem and Vendor Support

Documentation quality assessment should prioritize real-world implementation examples that move beyond API reference materials. Seek architecture guides addressing integration complexity, CI/CD pipeline configurations for build automation, troubleshooting resources for common implementation challenges, and code examples demonstrating integration patterns.

Vendor support structure evaluation becomes critical for production implementations:

• Support tier options and response time SLAs
• Professional services for implementation assistance
• Training resources for enterprise deployments
• Community forums and documentation

Strong community support through forums, tutorials, and plugins can significantly reduce development time and provide solutions to common implementation challenges.

What Does the Future Hold for Headless CMS Frameworks?

The headless CMS landscape is undergoing fundamental transformation driven by three converging forces: AI integration becoming foundational through "agentic content management" systems, composable architecture emerging as industry standard, and the rise of autonomous content operations that move beyond simple suggestions to autonomous routine management.

AI Integration Becomes Foundational

According to Forrester's CMS Wave, the industry is moving toward "agentic content management" where AI agents autonomously handle routine content operations including creation, optimization, and delivery. This represents a paradigm shift from AI as a helpful assistant to AI as an operational partner managing content workflows independently.

ThoughtWorks Technology Radar identifies "agentic workflows" as a critical architectural pattern, noting rapid evolution in AI coding workflows that enable automated content generation. These developments suggest that AI integration will transition from optional enhancement to foundational requirement in content management systems.

The implications for developers are significant. Teams should prepare for AI-enhanced content operations becoming standard capabilities, with agentic systems autonomously handling routine content management tasks while requiring new expertise in AI workflow orchestration, monitoring, and system integration.

Composable Architecture Becomes Standard

Industry analysts converge on composable architecture transitioning from emerging trend to foundational requirement. According to Forrester's Q1 2025 evaluation, headless delivery and modular architecture are now baseline expectations rather than differentiating features, with composability serving as a core evaluation criterion.

Gartner identifies three primary enterprise drivers accelerating adoption of composable architecture: agility in multi-channel content delivery, scalability for global digital operations, and enhanced customer experience capabilities through best-of-breed component selection.

This evolution means organizations will increasingly evaluate platforms based on their ability to integrate with broader technology ecosystems rather than standalone feature sets. API quality, integration capabilities, and microservices compatibility become primary selection criteria.

Edge Computing Integration for Global Performance

InfoQ's Architecture Trends identifies edge computing as a critical pattern enabling content delivery optimization through edge processing for improved performance. Modern headless CMS platforms are evolving edge compatibility as a native capability alongside composable system interoperability and advanced API management.

This integration enables content processing and personalization at edge locations, reducing latency and improving user experiences globally.

Headless CMS frameworks enable performance optimization through several architectural patterns:

• Multi-layer caching at CDN, API, and application levels
• Edge computing integration for content delivery optimization
• Content personalization engines operating alongside caching strategies

Implementation complexity requires careful orchestration across the distributed architecture to realize these potential benefits.

Enhanced Developer Experience and Collaboration

Forrester's CMS Wave report identifies enhanced collaboration tools as a critical evolution for developer experience, including visual editors, Microsoft Teams and Slack integration, and improved support for distributed development teams.

VentureBeat analysis highlights additional developer experience improvements:

• Modularity and extensibility
• Decoupled storage architecture
• Ease of integration
• Improved data management capabilities

These improvements focus on reducing implementation friction and enabling more seamless collaboration between technical and non-technical team members.

Market Growth and Enterprise Adoption

The headless CMS market demonstrates strong growth momentum, with projections of 19-22% CAGR through 2028, driven by enterprise digital transformation requirements and the adoption of composable architecture patterns.

For developers, the more meaningful drivers are architectural: multi-channel content delivery requirements, the shift toward composable architectures as foundational (rather than optional), and the rise of API-first design enabling flexible content deployment across web, mobile, IoT, and emerging platforms.

Enterprise adoption is particularly strong, with organizations recognizing the strategic advantages of decoupled architectures for multi-channel digital experiences, global content delivery, and integration with existing technology investments.

Forrester's research documents quantifiable business benefits including improved conversion rates, operational cost savings, enhanced team productivity, and faster time-to-market for digital experiences. Specifically, Forrester research on enterprise headless CMS implementations shows 40% reduction in developer time on website operations and overall improvements across conversion, operational costs, productivity, and time-to-market metrics.

Choosing the Right Headless CMS Framework for Modern Web Development

Headless CMS frameworks represent a fundamental shift toward flexible, API-driven architectures that enable true multi-channel content delivery.

The measurable performance benefits (30-50% page load improvements and 40-60% latency reductions documented across peer-reviewed studies) demonstrate clear technical advantages for applications requiring scale and global reach, though these gains require proper API architecture design, multi-layer caching strategies, and frontend framework expertise to realize.

Strapi provides the ideal foundation for organizations ready to embrace headless architecture while maintaining development velocity and operational simplicity:

• Open-source flexibility: Avoid vendor lock-in with complete customization control and transparent development practices.
• Developer-first design: Comprehensive APIs, CLI tools, and framework integrations that accelerate development workflows.
• Extensible plugin architecture: Customize functionality through the marketplace ecosystem without core platform modifications.
• Enterprise-ready security: Role-based access control, authentication systems, and compliance support for production deployments.
• Multi-framework support: Integration with React, Vue, Next.js, and emerging frontend technologies.
• Strapi Cloud: Fully managed hosting with automated scaling, backups, and performance optimization for teams focused on building rather than infrastructure management.

Ready to experience the flexibility and performance advantages of modern headless architecture? Start your free trial and build your first headless application in minutes.